Stephen Port

Image copyright
Family handout

Image caption

Port, now 44, from Barking in east London, was sentenced to a full life term in November 2016

None of the officers investigated for potential misconduct in the initial response to the serial killer Stephen Port will be disciplined, the police watchdog has said.

But the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC) said its inquiry had identified “systemic failings” within the Metropolitan Police.

Nine officers will be required to improve their standards, it added.

The families of Port’s victims have given an undertaking not to comment.

A spokeswoman said this was a condition demanded by the IOPC when they handed the families the final report – which is not due to be published until after the inquests for Port’s four victims.

There is currently no start date for the inquests – despite being ordered in November 2017.

‘Below standard’

Officers investigating the deaths of four young men ignored or dismissed evidence linking their murders to Port.

The watchdog told the BBC that: “While we agreed none of the officers involved in these investigations may have breached professional standards justifying disciplinary proceedings, we will be making a number of recommendations to the Metropolitan Police to address some of the systemic failings our investigation identified.

“We have advised the families of Stephen Port’s victims and the officers involved that the performance of nine officers fell below the standard required.

“They will now be required to improve their performance.”

During a preliminary hearing on Friday, the Old Bailey heard the inquests would focus on the “adequacy of the police investigation”.

The announcement means that none of the 17 Met officers investigated have been referred for misconduct proceedings by the IOPC.

The Met made a referral to the watchdog in October 2015 after identifying concerns regarding the initial investigations into the men’s deaths.

Ten officers were served with misconduct notices and a further seven with gross misconduct notices.

Misconduct is when an officer fails to follow expected standards of professional behaviour. Gross misconduct is when a breach is so serious it could justify dismissal.

The IOPC inquiry related to the investigative work undertaken, how evidence was examined, and how similarities between the cases were considered.

The 17, ranging in rank from constable to inspector, were largely local officers from Barking and Dagenham. None worked on the later successful murder inquiry.

Last year the BBC revealed that all but one of them gave ‘no comment’ interviews to the IOPC.

Port, now 44, from Barking in east London, was sentenced to a full life term in 2016 after being convicted of murdering four young men.

Between June 2014 and September 2015, he murdered:

  • Anthony Walgate, 23, originally from Hull
  • Gabriel Kovari, 22, from Lewisham
  • Daniel Whitworth, 21, from Gravesend, Kent
  • Jack Taylor, 25, from Dagenham, east London.

Port met his victims online, including through the dating app Grindr, before luring them to his flat where they were drugged and raped.

He murdered the four men by giving them fatal overdoses of the date-rape drug GHB.

Evidence heard at trial, and uncovered by a BBC investigation, showed there were a series of chances to catch Port sooner.

Image copyright
Met Police

Image caption

Anthony Walgate (L) and Gabriel Kovari (R) were Port’s first victims

The first victim, Anthony Walgate, was found outside Port’s flat and the other three either in or next to a nearby churchyard.

Port was jailed for his initial lies about the first death, but police accepted his subsequent excuses and did not treat the case as homicide.

Police did not examine a computer seized from Port, which would have revealed his interest in drugging and raping young men.

While on bail, prior to being charged, Port killed twice more.

Port falsely linked his second and third victims together in order to cover up his crimes.

A fake suicide note found in Daniel Whitworth’s hand, which had actually been written by Port, said he accidentally killed Gabriel Kovari and was taking his own life in response.

In fact, the two victims did not know one another.

Image copyright
Met Police

Image caption

Daniel Whitworth (L) and Jack Taylor (R) were also killed by Port

Police accepted the note at face value and treated the deaths as non-suspicious, despite concerns raised by people close to both men.

The note was in Port’s handwriting and bore traces of his DNA, as did other items found with the bodies of Mr Kovari and Mr Whitworth.

Detectives did not trace the man referred to in the note as the “guy I was with last night”, which would have led them to the killer.

Port murdered Jack Taylor after serving a short prison sentence, but police did not treat the death as suspicious for several weeks, despite the urging of the Taylor family, who investigated the case themselves and realised the other deaths were linked.

Mr Kovari’s former flatmate John Pape had earlier come to same conclusion about his friend, which he pointed out to the Met in a series of emails and during an inquest.

Port used a fake Facebook profile to spread lies about the deaths, including in direct correspondence with Mr Kovari’s ex-boyfriend, but police did not investigate the account despite it being sent to them.

The case was solved after being passed from local teams in Barking and Dagenham to specialist homicide detectives.

Senior Met figures apologised to the families in the aftermath of the trial.

When he quashed the original inquests findings for two of the victims, Lord Justice Holroyde said it seemed “surprising that the initial police investigation revealed so little of the full picture and appears to have led quite quickly to a conclusion that there was no evidence of any crime having been committed by any person still living”.

dishwasher repairs greenford

Source link

Comments 0

Leave a Comment